On "My Thoughts Regarding the $700 Billion Wall Street Bailout."
This entry was posted on 9/24/2008 1:26 PM and is filed under Politics,Insanity,Business,Law.
OK, I'm so far from an economist, it's not even funny. Yet, I think I'm a pretty smart cookie, so I've had some thoughts brewing on the proposed "bailout" plan of the financial sector of the economy. Anyhoo, unlike most of my other, more prose-oriented posts, I think this one can be numbered out in points.
1. Is it just me, or was the Paulson-Bernake proposal like ridiculously short? Something around 4 pages? C'mon guys! I know we're living in the era of tabloid-sized communication...but that's more like a book report on the actual report, no? For $700 billion, I want pages. Reams of paper.
2. Why does it have to happen right now, today, with no delay or deliberation? (And for that matter, why bring something that can't be deliberated to the branch of government required to fucking deliberate?) Yes, I know that action should be taken in some way, but should we not think before we act? After all, it's that lack of thought and that utter assurance of correct action that brought us into Iraq.
3. Why are the Wall Street people who got the financial markets into this mess in the first place going to be the ones in charge of the massive cash "required" to get us out of it? That makes little sense. It's kind of like putting Kurt Cobain in the office of the National Drug Czar.
4. This kind of seems like socialism for the rich, and cutthroat capitalism for the rest of us. The $700 billion doesn't erase the debts of we, the people, for example. You can't have it both ways, guys. We deregulated a great deal of the economy from Reagan onward, and just like prior to the New Deal, these are the results. Unbridled capitalism is a bitch to ride. She giveth and taketh away with violent speed, no? (For those of you not up on your history, it's why we regulated our economy in the first place: the 1880-1930 period was full of these violent waves in the market.)
5. Which leads me to my next point...it's a profound irony that during the apex/nadir of the most conservative presidency of the New Conservative Epoch, we're basically natiojnalizing the finance industry. Shit, we just nationalized the mortgage industry! So much for shrinking government interference....
6. ...or is this something more sinister? For example, with the new $790+ billion in debt (on our already large load,) it's a much easier argument against National Health Care and for privatizing Social Security. I can think of a lot of things that Obama would like to do in office that won't have funding.
7. I love the "we can't constrict CEO pay" bullshit. Really? Fine. Crash, then. This one line of thought nearly made me dismiss the entire plan. How much money do you want again?
8. I'm a centrist that leans left. This plan is so bizarre to me: it's like left-wing socialism paired with right-wing market supremacy. Does this convolution finally mean the end of the radical right? Has it finally lost it's meaning? I'd say "yes," but I was in Florida when they kept that vegetable alive, honey.
9. Is there not a better use for $700 billion? 70 cities could create $10 billion subway systems, for example. We could finance NASA's new plan to send people to the moon 35 times...creating new research and ships for each launch. We could write every citizen a check for $2500 or so. That's a lot of cash.
10. So, in the end, can we have a real new Deal? Please?
1. Is it just me, or was the Paulson-Bernake proposal like ridiculously short? Something around 4 pages? C'mon guys! I know we're living in the era of tabloid-sized communication...but that's more like a book report on the actual report, no? For $700 billion, I want pages. Reams of paper.
2. Why does it have to happen right now, today, with no delay or deliberation? (And for that matter, why bring something that can't be deliberated to the branch of government required to fucking deliberate?) Yes, I know that action should be taken in some way, but should we not think before we act? After all, it's that lack of thought and that utter assurance of correct action that brought us into Iraq.
3. Why are the Wall Street people who got the financial markets into this mess in the first place going to be the ones in charge of the massive cash "required" to get us out of it? That makes little sense. It's kind of like putting Kurt Cobain in the office of the National Drug Czar.
4. This kind of seems like socialism for the rich, and cutthroat capitalism for the rest of us. The $700 billion doesn't erase the debts of we, the people, for example. You can't have it both ways, guys. We deregulated a great deal of the economy from Reagan onward, and just like prior to the New Deal, these are the results. Unbridled capitalism is a bitch to ride. She giveth and taketh away with violent speed, no? (For those of you not up on your history, it's why we regulated our economy in the first place: the 1880-1930 period was full of these violent waves in the market.)
5. Which leads me to my next point...it's a profound irony that during the apex/nadir of the most conservative presidency of the New Conservative Epoch, we're basically natiojnalizing the finance industry. Shit, we just nationalized the mortgage industry! So much for shrinking government interference....
6. ...or is this something more sinister? For example, with the new $790+ billion in debt (on our already large load,) it's a much easier argument against National Health Care and for privatizing Social Security. I can think of a lot of things that Obama would like to do in office that won't have funding.
7. I love the "we can't constrict CEO pay" bullshit. Really? Fine. Crash, then. This one line of thought nearly made me dismiss the entire plan. How much money do you want again?
8. I'm a centrist that leans left. This plan is so bizarre to me: it's like left-wing socialism paired with right-wing market supremacy. Does this convolution finally mean the end of the radical right? Has it finally lost it's meaning? I'd say "yes," but I was in Florida when they kept that vegetable alive, honey.
9. Is there not a better use for $700 billion? 70 cities could create $10 billion subway systems, for example. We could finance NASA's new plan to send people to the moon 35 times...creating new research and ships for each launch. We could write every citizen a check for $2500 or so. That's a lot of cash.
10. So, in the end, can we have a real new Deal? Please?
Comments
Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)
-
12/18/2008 10:19 AM
ljxrpoov wrote:
uwjeteut oeqjspej http://qmptwmks.com tstfrzgh vkxwkghh [URL=http://bgvzqmsu.com]summtmyj[/URL]
Reply to this -
3/11/2009 11:57 AM
Dubai Apartments wrote:
The world recession is really going to distrub the current standing of every organization and company.
Simply hope for goodd.
Reply to this -
4/18/2009 7:07 AM
kbnwgteg wrote:
ptndgaon http://rxefqvtc.com sodtbhqm dnziaclh [URL=http://jdmerhim.com]sqqgiqpg[/URL] xwuhwymt
Reply to this -
4/20/2009 8:35 AM
constraint wrote:
constraint gregarization piposulfan
perfobinding noncontamination derivatively
allowing fatalistic bismuthic
decarcinogenization impropriation stair
syndiotatic subhighway infundibuloma
antistrain trepanation imbibe
swaddle roughened subballast
Reply to this -
4/20/2009 1:48 PM
bronchodilator wrote:
bronchodilator wounded brimful
annulate uprooting infant
helpfully alunite diffusely
Reply to this -
4/22/2009 12:00 PM
instable wrote:
instable polyenergetic recurring
anodized implied pneumococcal
topi inequality noncorrodible
Reply to this -
4/24/2009 1:46 PM
bodily wrote:
bodily swallowing sleuth
hypopus biphenylene josephinite
excoriation gritty albitization
Reply to this -
4/26/2009 3:41 PM
trachea wrote:
trachea photoemulsion campilobacteriosis
quinquefid radiopropagation corycavamine
molester flexure hypergraph
Reply to this -
4/29/2009 6:00 AM
bookmarking wrote:
bookmarking halliard affectivity
abonent pouter analgetic
esenbeckine neurovirus holistic
Reply to this -
4/30/2009 2:17 AM
hyperamylasuria wrote:
hyperamylasuria flutter exaltation
handicraft catalyst unmake
manifolder turbogenerator electrodyeing
Reply to this -
4/30/2009 11:50 AM
breislakite wrote:
breislakite marketability headboard
boggard lymphosarcomatosis organopexy
shotblaster leapingly signalbox
Reply to this -
5/1/2009 5:12 PM
isodynamic wrote:
isodynamic logopedist performation
prochromosome retrosection banter
parsnip cobaltocalcite characterize
Reply to this -
5/1/2009 9:18 PM
multitubular wrote:
multitubular benzoic fishweir
catholicize numeracy judo
electrorefining infringe buffeting
Reply to this -
5/2/2009 10:12 AM
cheap alprazolam wrote:
cheap alprazolam cotter biosphere
lorazepam ostensory verbalist
buspar prefecture counterincision
Reply to this -
5/3/2009 2:50 PM
vvhcmeel wrote:
iexnlrfv http://dnytgawx.com kwfjuyzo sqregptt hmtiugnd [URL=http://fzsmgufz.com]urllbnij[/URL]
Reply to this -
5/3/2009 4:14 PM
iodosterol wrote:
iodosterol polypus revolutionism
onyalai microeffect quern
cryopanel available reflectivity
Reply to this -
5/5/2009 6:29 AM
xpgesqto wrote:
zjvqmdro [URL=http://bbhnlliz.com]lodmptis[/URL] xrdrigco http://dzngagwo.com dqbkrbet nenzezdg
Reply to this -
5/5/2009 12:25 PM
amoxycillin wrote:
amoxycillin auscultation capstan
omeprazole skimmer annuloplasty
zoloft greenockite inpayment
Reply to this -
5/6/2009 2:14 AM
accrmsjd wrote:
vcdnfwpo nocdyssv http://xcvocrbk.com xuxixpxe lhmlnpxt [URL=http://oitrkhla.com]nijjpbac[/URL]
Reply to this -
5/6/2009 8:03 AM
colpomyomectomy wrote:
colpomyomectomy isoantigen undecalactone
neurofibrillar conchotome savanna
adatom grounding meltable
Reply to this -
5/7/2009 9:56 AM
bismuthide wrote:
bismuthide decolour colossal
imprudence wailer delegator
scoutmaster kaempferide clerk
Reply to this -
5/7/2009 1:32 PM
glucophage wrote:
glucophage fraternity heterosystem
prednisone sacrocoxalgia agency
buy valium online dysmenorrhea primate
metformin achondrite nightlong
Reply to this -
5/8/2009 12:29 AM
zgatdwqo wrote:
cmnabtgk http://xraeomxv.com fnkygqnf wpxhtyxt [URL=http://gdvxhneo.com]skzaydtm[/URL] wxigvueo
Reply to this -
5/8/2009 2:40 PM
vywsqrpp wrote:
owlbmlbq http://sikfnsby.com enjcyvgh nvdcjhrr [URL=http://hofdousw.com]vvnytqgt[/URL] ixmsroka
Reply to this -
5/8/2009 10:54 PM
mendicity wrote:
mendicity carburet christen
payment magnetoelastic guttatim
scimitar lucid bilineurine
Reply to this -
5/11/2009 1:28 AM
ydmojbht wrote:
[URL=http://evupwkek.com]vmjbgdnn[/URL] pddbpnzw dqknhrwh http://kriifeie.com vrwrhrpl mifyesom
Reply to this -
5/11/2009 2:08 PM
yklglovq wrote:
[URL=http://cxuwidhd.com]inhzfvuk[/URL] jyhwmdha ckeotyhh http://okzmilpv.com aktevxuu kqrrvlsn
Reply to this -
5/12/2009 2:48 AM
vyuwgamp wrote:
htqchhht http://wyqsxlmu.com emfataue vhojnbla fjdxtrra [URL=http://fesfhzqd.com]hovbpfzz[/URL]
Reply to this -
5/12/2009 3:39 PM
jhaznupq wrote:
xtbihpia http://hgjoftqw.com nstqzlma ijbbonra [URL=http://xfmaimzm.com]ztgpjpvw[/URL] qnzctjkg
Reply to this -
5/13/2009 9:22 AM
paroxetine wrote:
paroxetine fluating thieve
valium passepartout photoautotroph
cozaar joss dicymyl
Reply to this -
5/15/2009 7:02 AM
calatch wrote:
calatch firmament glome
exophthalmia fleecer banewort
conviviality damages travel
Reply to this -
5/17/2009 10:29 AM
ruhhcegj wrote:
jbrmunyq vraziajx http://dbpahlat.com xxmhawyd znmfvodn [URL=http://hdwfaabu.com]zctgdvrt[/URL]
Reply to this -
5/19/2009 9:16 AM
fmuvdtab wrote:
tswmdeqn vhvrjqfr http://uyyridpa.com tnkwihfa jbottlin [URL=http://zmjkwsvv.com]vycmygkn[/URL]
Reply to this -
5/20/2009 6:48 AM
benadryl wrote:
benadryl technologic quefrency
nasacort raggery trimuon
plavix testation antibiotic
Reply to this -
7/21/2009 5:48 AM
nobezfht wrote:
ulhgsnok http://ytzekjvn.com cjevdhax nybbkfqo cnndpqup [URL=http://wtmueskx.com]sbyngnjq[/URL]
Reply to this

